BNS Section 126- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
BNS Section 126- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Wrongful Restraint
Contact Us
Wrongful Restraint
Section 126 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 deals with the offence of wrongful restraint, which involves unlawfully preventing a person from moving in a direction in which they have a legal right to proceed.
Section 126 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 deals with the offence of wrongful restraint, which involves unlawfully preventing a person from moving in a direction in which they have a legal right to proceed.
Searching Google for legal answers?
Online advice can’t replace real legal expertise.
Speak directly with a qualified lawyer who understands
your case.
Definition of Wrongful Restraint
A person commits wrongful restraint when they voluntarily obstruct another person, thereby preventing that person from proceeding in any direction in which they have a lawful right to move.
In simple terms, it means intentionally blocking someone’s path or freedom of movement without legal justification.
Definition of Wrongful Restraint
A person commits wrongful restraint when they voluntarily obstruct another person, thereby preventing that person from proceeding in any direction in which they have a lawful right to move.
In simple terms, it means intentionally blocking someone’s path or freedom of movement without legal justification.
Legal Exception
Obstructing a private path over land or water is not an offence if the person blocking it:
- Acts in good faith, and
- Honestly believes they have a lawful right to do so
Legal Exception
Obstructing a private path over land or water is not an offence if the person blocking it:
- Acts in good faith, and
- Honestly believes they have a lawful right to do so
Contact Us
Illustration
If A blocks a pathway that Z has a legal right to use, and A does not honestly believe they have the right to block it, then A has wrongfully restrained Z.
Example
Rakesh blocks the main street leading to a metro station and prevents Vijay from entering. Since Vijay has a legal right to use that road, Rakesh’s act amounts to wrongful restraint.
Illustration
If A blocks a pathway that Z has a legal right to use, and A does not honestly believe they have the right to block it, then A has wrongfully restrained Z.
Example
Rakesh blocks the main street leading to a metro station and prevents Vijay from entering. Since Vijay has a legal right to use that road, Rakesh’s act amounts to wrongful restraint.
Key Elements of the Offence
1. Voluntary Obstruction
The act must be intentional. Accidental blocking does not qualify.
2. Right to Proceed
The victim must have a lawful right to move in that direction.
3. Prevention of Movement
The obstruction may be in any direction – forward, backward, or sideways.
Key Elements of the Offence
1. Voluntary Obstruction
The act must be intentional. Accidental blocking does not qualify.
2. Right to Proceed
The victim must have a lawful right to move in that direction.
3. Prevention of Movement
The obstruction may be in any direction – forward, backward, or sideways.
Punishment for Wrongful Restraint
A person guilty under Section 126 may face:
- Simple imprisonment up to 1 month, or
- Fine up to ₹5,000, or
- Both imprisonment and fine
Nature of the Offence
- Offence: Wrongfully restraining any person
- Cognizable: Yes
- Bailable: Yes
- Triable by: Any Magistrate
Punishment for Wrongful Restraint
A person guilty under Section 126 may face:
- Simple imprisonment up to 1 month, or
- Fine up to ₹5,000, or
- Both imprisonment and fine
Nature of the Offence
- Offence: Wrongfully restraining any person
- Cognizable: Yes
- Bailable: Yes
- Triable by: Any Magistrate
Understanding the Offence
Wrongful restraint protects a person’s right to free movement. Physical injury or force is not required — merely blocking someone’s lawful path is enough.
Common situations include:
- Blocking a road, doorway, or entrance
- Standing in front of someone to prevent passage
- Parking a vehicle intentionally to block another vehicle’s exit
Understanding the Offence
Wrongful restraint protects a person’s right to free movement. Physical injury or force is not required — merely blocking someone’s lawful path is enough.
Common situations include:
- Blocking a road, doorway, or entrance
- Standing in front of someone to prevent passage
- Parking a vehicle intentionally to block another vehicle’s exit
Difference Between Wrongful Restraint and Wrongful Confinement
- Wrongful Restraint: Prevents movement in a particular direction
- Wrongful Confinement: Restricts a person within defined boundaries so they cannot leave at all
Difference Between Wrongful Restraint and Wrongful Confinement
- Wrongful Restraint: Prevents movement in a particular direction
- Wrongful Confinement: Restricts a person within defined boundaries so they cannot leave at all
Searching Google for legal answers?
Online advice can’t replace real legal expertise.
Speak directly with a qualified lawyer who understands
your case.
